|
Next Left Notes Is A News Magazine Devoted To Direct Action
By Thomas Good
• SDS •
Growing up during the Sixties and early Seventies I was an admirer
of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Participatory democracy
as an internal structure for a political organization and as a model
for deepening democracy in the United States had tremendous appeal.
Despite being a few years too young to participate in SDS I nonetheless
felt a part of the Movement and a personal regard for Bernardine Dohrn:
"La Pasionara of the Lunatic Left" as she was called by J. Edgar Hoover.
She was attractive, flambuoyant and brilliant as the spokesperson for
the resistance. I was impressed with her revolutionary fervor and,
being an adolescent, smitten as well.
Photo: Bernardine Dohrn (TM Good)
However, SDS fractured in 1969 and in 1970 the leadership (the Weatherman
faction) went underground to pursue Armed Propaganda as a means of
conveying their revolutionary message. When Vietnam ended in 1975 the
Weather Underground Organization (WUO) lost alot of their impetus and
the peace movement itself seemed to grind to a halt. Many activists,
myself included, joined socialist organizations in order to continue the
struggle. Although The War had ended, the Empire was not dismantled
and it used various lethal methods to continue State policy by other
means. It had to be resisted, even with our depleted numbers.
Over the next two decades the Soviet Union collapsed and many struggles
for national liberation faltered, some being impaled on the sword of
US imperialism. Things seemed grim and neoliberal aggression continued,
unchecked for the most part, both at home and abroad. Then came Seattle.
The anti-globalization struggle rocked the complacent corporate rulers
of the US and animated the Left. The emergence of a militant opposition
to business as usual was not led by the Old Left (the socialist parties)
nor by the New Left leaders of the Sixties. The resistance was populated
by activists who identified as anarchist.
After the seizure of power by the Bush forces in 2000 and the flagrant
violation of international law embodied in the invasion and annexation
of Iraq, the Old Left, many New Leftists and the Anarchist Resistance
took to the streets. In my own experience, as we all sat together in jail,
during the 2004 Republican National Convention, solidarity was very evident.
In the grime of Pier 57 sat 70 year old Quakers, middleaged New Leftists,
Old Left socialists, and large numbers of young anarchists. In this
climate I witnessed the beginnings of a dialogue between the old and new
guard.
• NCOR •
Since 1998, American University in Washington, D.C. has been the
site of the National Conference on Organized Resistance (NCOR), an
event designed to "provide a space for activists to meet each other,
have in-depth discussions, analyze our strategies, tactics, beliefs,
learn a few new skills, and give everyone a lot to think about". {1}
Myself and one other member of the Direct Action Tendency (a formalized
tendency within the Socialist Party USA which is often called the
"anarchist wing" of the Party due to our emphasis on non-sectarian,
non-hierarchical - read participatory democracy - and activist oriented
political mass work) journeyed to the 2005 NCOR. We intended to table
there as a means of building our upcoming direct actions. {2} But
we were also keenly interested in attending a workshop entitled:
"Comparing Radical Traditions: A Democratic Socialist-Anarchist
Dialogue. The workshop was being led by Lucas Shapiro, a Young
Democratic Socialists leader with an impressive resume. I was personally
hopeful that the dialogue I witnessed at Pier 57 could be replicated
on a much larger scale...
Sam and I arrived in DC on Saturday morning and found American University
without difficulty. We setup our table, did a fair amount of chatting
about upcoming actions with passersby and a little shopping for Lefty
kitsch before heading off to our "dialogues" workshop.
The workshop was a very big draw, much to the surprise of the presenters.
Sitting crosslegged on the floor, my comrade Sam and I listened as the
basic arguments of the YDS folks were laid out. Unfortunately the
focus appeared to be on the issue of whether the State was essential
to the continuation of various basic services (such as sewage disposal
etc.) This narrow focus caused some restlessness within the audience,
largely young and anarchist. It also was revealing in the sense that
the YDS presenters appeared to be unable to conceptualize a social
order that was born of a revolutionary change rather than a series
of incremental reforms. More significant was the fact that by zeroing
in on anti-Statist versus social democratic viewpoints no dialogue on
practical matters (joint organizing) occured. This issue was raised
as an obviously heartfelt plea by a young anarchist sister who complained
of being tired of rehashing the same old divisive arguements and who
clearly wanted to know how the Left could work together. I spoke at this
point suggesting that the Direct Action Tendency of the SP was very eager
to hear what our friends in the anarchist community had to say and that we
are extremely interested in working together. I did not expect much
in the way of response, as I've been called a "boring old Marxist trying
to co-opt direct action" by some (sectarian) anarchists on the NYC Anarchist
listserv. To my surprise the response was very positive and several
anarchist brothers and sisters requested the url of our website. {4}
We left the workshop hopeful that a dialogue between socialists
and anarchists is a real possibility. Back at our table we scanned
the list of workshops to see what else was of interest and to my shock
discovered that Bernardine Dohrn was speaking the following day, giving
a report back on the World Social Forum. Having never heard her speak
in public I could hardly wait to have that opportunity.
• Bernardine Dohrn •
Sunday morning, after some tabling and conversation with other activists
Sam and I located the lecture room where Bernardine was speaking. We
got there early (for once) and secured seats in the second row.
Bernardine was introduced as a former SDS/WUO leader, a professor of law
at Northwestern University and child's rights activist, a mother of three
and lastly, a grandmother - at which point she smiled and raised both fists
in the air in celebration. She began her talk with some obviously sincere
praise for the activists in the room: "You're doing great! We are hoping
to join you (in the struggle)". Although the presentation was meant to be
a report back from the recent World Social Forum in Brazil it covered alot
more ground that this and started with a question: "We are living with a
permanent war...and a...national security state. How do we go towards
building a radical movement?", she asked. "Today the US spends as much (on
the military) as all of the other countries of the world combined. Why?
There are three reasons: to control the world's resources; to police
unfriendly or terrorist regimes (and); to dominate markets".
Addressing how to identify the key issues around which to build
a radical movement, Dohrn urged the audience to read the speeches of Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. "Not the pablum Dr. King, but the radical...
read the speeches of the last two years of his life...he argued that the
three greatest dangers are racism, militarism and consumerism."
"We should add one", Dohrn said, "Importation of religious language into
politics. It justifies everything". She added that it reduced complex
issues into a fantasy good v. evil polarity in order to obscure the real
issues including the insatiable US lust for oil: "If the rest of the
world consumed oil at the rate the US does all of the world's oil would
be depleted in 19 days."
Dohrn spoke about the World Social Forum where the idea that the US and
it's ideology of consumerism, it's belief that "this is the only game
in town, that this is the dominant ideology" was effectively challenged.
Bernardine urged the activists present to reject this ideology and to
work to overcome the geographic illiteracy that afflicts all Americans,
and to overcome the memory loss this illiteracy facilitates:
"We have a kind of amnesia about the rest of the world". Dohrn spoke
about her own ignorance regarding what had gone on in Rwanda, or even
where it was on a map, until one of her students proposed going there.
After a class outing to Rwanda and digestion of ten books on the genocide
that had occured there Bernardine and her students felt they knew "a
little" about the subject...but still felt as Americans they needed to
learn more. Dohrn put a question to the audience: "Can you name the
six nations that border Iraq?" No one activist could do it but working
together the audience was able to name these countries. Dohrn saluted
this...and spoke about the Iraq invasion: "This incredible, illegal,
immoral war in Iraq (has produced) over 1100 US dead". Returning to
US amnesia and ignorance of other cultures Dohrn spoke about the fact
that the Vietnam and Iraq wars, despite many differences, "in some ways
are eerily similar". Both nations are "countries with an ancient
civilization". Iraq she added, "is the cradle of civilization", a fact
completely devalued and ignored by the US. This myopia has lethal
consequences: "the bombing and devastation in Fallujah is the Guernica
of our time", Dohrn said. This cannot stand, she argued, urging a
redefinition of 'terrorism' from a "humanist" point of view:
Terrorism is systemic violence against civilians." Further strippng
away any mystification, Dohrn noted that, from the US point of view:
"Terrorism means any opposition to the US government."
Turning to what is going on internally, Bernardine noted that the unlawful
detention of political prisoners of Arab descent in the US has produced
"show trials of Arabs (which) have produced nothing". Yet no one here
speaks up, none question these arrests either in the US or in the "little
puppy dog of the United States, England". Alluding to a solution to this
dilemma Dohrn urged the crowd to recognize the power of a few dedicated
people to change the world. She listed the two ingredients that produce
a dialectic of change: "the synthesis of civil rights and anti-war"
struggle produced the sixties. "But it really happened in the seventies",
she noted, laughing.
Bernardine, apparently somewhat constrained by the podium between her and
the activist audience, hugged the lecturn, leaning forward, gripping the
small microphone. "We need to know what is happening in Mosul, in San
Quention, Attica..." she intoned. She spoke about struggling to free
political prisoners who had challenged US ideology and been jailed for it.
She spoke of the plight of all political prisoners and prisoners of (class)
war here in the US who have been "excluded, marginalized". "In prison we have
the modern day equivalent of slavery", she noted. She urged intensifying
efforts to free some prominent political prisoners like Leonard Peltier
and David Gilbert.
Tying together the threads of working for change and working to free political
prisoners, Dohrn argued forcefully for a world view based on compassion:
"A world of reciprocal recognition is at the heart of humanism". Returning
to the idea that a few dedicated people can change the world, she jokingly
referred to the "non-existent sixties" wherein no one really felt they were
making a difference. "We went to Ann Arbor...they said: we're so disorganized,
it's not happening here, it's happening in Columbia. We went to Columbia...
they said: we're so disorganized it's not happening here, it's happening in
France..." Laughing with the audience Dohrn continued: "It was always true
throughout the Sixties that we were small and marginalized." Arguing that
since we had put to rest the myth of the "nonexistent Sixties" and that
the corporate media had declared it legally dead: "now it really is, let's
bury it!" And just as the myth of the Sixties implied an irresistable force
so, Dohrn argues, the myth of Empire posits itself as the only thing possible.
"But that notion is obviously completely wrong. There is nothing invincible
about Imperialism...they resort to force AS THE FIRST OPTION", demonstrating
their weakness. She spoke about Bush, comparing his re-election to that of
Nixon: "After his second election, Nixon was out within a year."
Speaking about the need for unity and reconciliation within the Left, Dohrn
pointed out that one glaring failure of the Sixties was the ostracizing of
veterans. She noted that Black vets in particular had alot to offer in
terms of educating those youth who might be lured into military service.
Turning to alternative models of development in the world, Dohrn spoke
about Venezuela as a counterpoint to US cultural hegemony. In Venezuela
she pointed out a "Democratic, Peaceful, Bolivarian, Revolutionary"
government is feeding the people and providing healthcare, thanks to
the presence of Cuban doctors. Noting that we must all struggle together
towards this and other anti-imperialist, anti-consumerist models of
development Dohrn stated that "under one big tent" is how we must carry
the struggle forward. We must remember that "the Black freedom movement"
is the cornerstone of our struggle, she insisted. With Her revolutionary
passion still intact after years of struggle, her charm and natural manner
still readily apparent, she revealed the source of her strength:
"We need our humor!" Humor is an essential ingredient for staying power.
She also noted that "we need three things: organizing, activism and
education". All three must be present for us to be effective she added.
Concluding her remarks, Bernardine emphasized that the young are the hope
and expressed gratitude that the Sixties generation might be allowed to
play a role in the struggle by "riding on your coattails". Dohrn mentioned
a tidal wave of change that will yet bring about a better world. She leaned
forward and said: "You're part of that tidal wave, I thank you!"
In a quiet tone Dohrn mentioned that her own interest in the youth and
"children's rights is due to having three sons" and that her ability to
see the world in terms of its children causes her to frame the struggle in
terms of providing a better world for these children.
After sustained applause and a word from the moderator, Dohrn returned
to the microphone to take questions. Responding to a question about the
nature of US imperialism and how to combat it she replied: "The US
invented modern day terrorism...for me nonviolence isn't a worldview,
it's a tactic."
A committed radical and revolutionary at 63, Dohrn offered this insight:
"The difference between reform and revolutionary struggles is linking the
issues..." Addressing the entire audience she offered an apology:
"I'm deeply sorry, we never thought we'd leave you this world." Offering
one last bit of advice on how to rectify the current state of affairs
Bernardine said: "Be certain enough to act and to doubt simultaneously".
Regarding the current situation she said at least twice:
"I'm extremely hopeful".
After the talk ended Bernardine remained at the podium to talk one on one
with activists. I approached her and mentioned our work on the March
19th direct actions. She asked to confirm the date and then said "great!"
when I emphasized that the actions would be at recruiting centers. As a
parting gift from an old admirer I gave her a Direct Action Tendency
button, pointing out that the logo is based on the old SDS Days of Rage
raised fist. She looked at the button, laughed and pinned it to her
jacket. It was a very special moment for this New Leftist.
Photo: Bernardine with DAT badge (Sam Morales )
• Aftermath •
Journeying home, Sam and I discussed our direct actions upcoming and
also the need to continue the dialogue between socialists and anarchists.
Thinking about Bernardine's advice on the subject we made a note to
incorporate equal parts humanism and humor in our organizing and to
remember to thank our young anarchist brothers and sisters for allowing
us to be a part of the struggle for their future.
• NOTES •
{1} www.organizedresistance.org (NCOR home page)
{2} www.actiontendency.net/m19.pdf (Counter-recruitment actions
taking place on the second anniversary of the Iraq invasion).
{3} Direct Action Tendency http://www.actiontendency.net
Home
Next Left Notes
(c) 2004,2006 Thomas Good
Verbatim copying and distribution of entire articles is permitted
without royalty in any medium provided this notice is preserved.
|